Hi Les, 

We've converged on draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00.txt. Once updated, 
I'll immediately start a short WG adoption poll on this draft.

Thanks,
Acee

On 4/3/18, 10:44 AM, "Lsr on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)" 
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:

    Hi Les, 
    
    Can you resubmit as draft-ginsberg-lsr-rfc7810bis-00.txt? Also, please add 
a "Changes from RFC 7810" section to the "Introduction". I see you have added 
RFC8174 to the "Requirements Language" section already. 
    
    I think we should accept this as an LSR Working Group document - does 
anyone disagree? 
    
    Thanks,
    Acee
    
    On 3/30/18, 6:39 PM, "Lsr on behalf of Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" 
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
    
        Folks -
        
        A bis version of RFC 7810 has been submitted to address the issue 
reported in Errata ID: 5293 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7810
        
        Given that there exist implementations which have interpreted the 
ambiguous encoding of some sub-TLVs in different/non-interoperable ways it was 
felt that a bis version of the RFC was justified.
        Please see the Appendix of the draft for a discussion of the changes 
from RFC 7810 and the reasons why.
        
           Les
        
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: [email protected] <[email protected]> 
        Sent: Friday, March 30, 2018 3:33 PM
        To: Qin Wu <[email protected]>; David Ward (wardd) <[email protected]>; 
Spencer Giacolone <[email protected]>; Spencer Giacalone 
<[email protected]>; John Drake <[email protected]>; Les Ginsberg 
(ginsberg) <[email protected]>; David Ward (wardd) <[email protected]>; Stefano 
Previdi <[email protected]>
        Subject: New Version Notification for 
draft-ginsberg-isis-rfc7810bis-00.txt
        
        
        A new version of I-D, draft-ginsberg-isis-rfc7810bis-00.txt
        has been successfully submitted by Les Ginsberg and posted to the IETF 
repository.
        
        Name:           draft-ginsberg-isis-rfc7810bis
        Revision:       00
        Title:          IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions
        Document date:  2018-03-30
        Group:          Individual Submission
        Pages:          19
        URL:            
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ginsberg-isis-rfc7810bis-00.txt
        Status:         
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ginsberg-isis-rfc7810bis/
        Htmlized:       
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ginsberg-isis-rfc7810bis-00
        Htmlized:       
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ginsberg-isis-rfc7810bis
        
        
        Abstract:
           In certain networks, such as, but not limited to, financial
           information networks (e.g., stock market data providers), network-
           performance criteria (e.g., latency) are becoming as critical to
           data-path selection as other metrics.
        
           This document describes extensions to IS-IS Traffic Engineering
           Extensions (RFC 5305) such that network-performance information can
           be distributed and collected in a scalable fashion.  The information
           distributed using IS-IS TE Metric Extensions can then be used to make
           path-selection decisions based on network performance.
        
           Note that this document only covers the mechanisms with which
           network-performance information is distributed.  The mechanisms for
           measuring network performance or acting on that information, once
           distributed, are outside the scope of this document.
        
           This document obsoletes RFC 7810.
        
        
                                                                                
          
        
        
        Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of 
submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
        
        The IETF Secretariat
        
        _______________________________________________
        Lsr mailing list
        [email protected]
        https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
        
    
    _______________________________________________
    Lsr mailing list
    [email protected]
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
    

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to