I support its adoption. Based on the discussion on the list, we can know that following the guideline of RFC5316 and RFC5305 is not the efficient way to extract the inter-AS topology as that required by https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-inter-as-topology-ext-09#section-5.1。we should also consider the further usage of the informtion that associated the stub link.
B.R. Yongqing Zhu zhu...@chinatelecom.cn From: Christian Hopps Date: 2022-01-04 14:58 To: lsr@ietf.org CC: lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; cho...@chopps.org; draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attribu...@ietf.org Subject: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attributes-02 Hi Folks, This begins a 2 week WG Adoption Call for the following draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attributes/ Please indicate your support or objections by January 18th, 2022. Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts. Thanks, Chris. _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
