Chris, all,
I'm aware that the WG last call has gone by and I'd understand it if my
comments are therefore put on one side. But rather than wait for IETF last
call, I thought I'd ask now...
I checked the mailing list and couldn't find any discussion of this point so:
is there any reason why the term "black hole" is also not being addressed? It
seems to fall under the NIST guidance ("Avoid terms that use ‘black’ to mean
something bad or negative") and is present in 5838.
Thanks,
Adrian
On 6/5/22, 5:55 AM, "Christian Hopps" <[email protected]> wrote:
Given the simplicity of this document and having received no objections or
edits prior to or during the adoption call we'll be moving it immediately to
WGLC...
This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending Jun 19th, 2022, for:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-terminology/
Authors,
Please indicate to the list, your knowledge of any IPR related to this
work.
Thanks,
Chris.
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
