Andreas, I prefer IceWM or Qvwm because they have a small footprint and also because my NICs and HUBs are still at 10 Mb. Therefore, NFS swap is out of the question. Moreover, my terminals are legacy 486s with no more than 24 Mb RAM. Which makes it impossible to setup for local applications.
Wouter On 03-Mar-03 Andreas Eckhart wrote: > does anyone know, which desktop environment has better performance > with > linux terminal services? > i heard something about, that GNOME shold work better than KDE > does. > > i would like to use it for about 20 - 30 clients > any experiences? > > thanks, andi > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > ____________________________________________________________________ > _ > Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, > goto: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss > For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net -------------------------------------------- Wouter DeBacker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 04-Mar-03 00:45:42 (SuSE Linux Xfmail) -------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
