Zitat von Alkis Georgopoulos <alk...@gmail.com>:

> On 22/02/2017 10:10 πμ, Johan Kragsterman wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the clarification of that, didn't know that.
>  > What I have read about ltsp-pnp is that it can't use other clients
>  > than the architecture of the server. Am I wrong there...?
>  > If so, that makes all the difference.
>
> For example, you can have a 64bit server,
> with the default 64bit ltsp-pnp chroot that can boot 64bit thin and fat
> clients,
> and then you can decide to run ltsp-build-client --arch i386 to support
> older i386 thin clients,
> and then you can decide to follow
> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuLTSP/RaspberryPi to build an
> armhf chroot to support booting raspberry pis too,
> etc etc
>
> ltsp-pnp just helps you set up your initial environment,
> and gives you a graphical way to manage your default chroot,
> it doesn't impose any limits to what you can do with your ltsp installation.


Interesting. That is new, right? I thought ltsp-pnp doesn't create a  
chroot. That's why we are still using ltsp-server-standalone on our  
ubuntu server.

So nowadays i would start with ltsp-pnp? Is ltsp-server-standalone  
obsolete (on ubuntu)?

Andreas


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net

Reply via email to