Le 05/06/2015 11:18, Norbert Preining a écrit : > On Fri, 05 Jun 2015, Peter Breitenlohner wrote: >> And how to place them for differnt architectures (e.g., coexisting i686 and >> x86_64) such that the 32- and 64-bit executables find the corresponding >> shared objects? > > I think the problem is not the positioning. We can easiky have > Master/lib/<ARCH>/... > and include that in some way. The problem is with portability within > the same arch/os combinations, from CentOS over SuSE to Debian et cetc, > all would need to be usable with *the*same* .so. > > I am not sure if that works, we haven't tried. And I am not sure > I want t ask all builders to try it out ;-)
That goes beyond my knowledge, but if CentOS over Suse is able to find the right luatex binary, would there be a reason for it not to find the right .so? Or do you mean same binaries wouldn't be able to load the same .so file on a different OS? Thank you, -- Elie
