On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:47 AM, luigi scarso <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Élie Roux <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Le 05/06/2015 11:42, Norbert Preining a écrit : >> > On Fri, 05 Jun 2015, Élie Roux wrote: >> >> right .so? Or do you mean same binaries wouldn't be able to load the >> >> same .so file on a different OS? >> > >> > Yes, that is the problem. We are not making a distinction between OS, >> > but ARCH-OS, for examples >> > x86_64-linux >> > which includes 64bit variants of all the major distributions, some >> > old, some new, some strange. >> > >> > And no, we will not have >> > debian-x86_64-linux >> > centos-x86_64-linux >> > ffobar... >> > No way. >> >> Sure, I'm just trying to understand: do you mean that the x86_64-linux >> luatex binary (which is the same under Debian, Suse, etc.) would be able >> to load the x86_64-linux .so on Debian but not under Suse? Why would >> this happen? > > dependencies unsatisfied, for example (sorry for the typo) -- luigi
