On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Élie Roux <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Sure, I'm just trying to understand: do you mean that the > x86_64-linux > > luatex binary (which is the same under Debian, Suse, etc.) would be > able > > to load the x86_64-linux .so on Debian but not under Suse? Why would > > this happen? > > > > dependencies unjustified, for example. > > Ok, but if TeXLive manages to compile some .so files (for XeTeX for > instance IIRC) and make it generic enough to be used under Debian, Suse, > etc. then I fail to see why it wouldn't manage to compile some .so files > for LuaTeX the same way? > > Thank you, > -- > Elie > hm, I don't see any so in my texlive 2015 pretest and in trunk/Master. The only dso I see are dll and none is problematic (almost all 32bit apart ./texmf-dist/scripts/context/stubs/win64/mtxrun.dll: PE32+ executable (DLL) (console) x86-64 (stripped to external PDB), for MS Windows) -- luigi
