On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Élie Roux <[email protected]> wrote:
> Le 05/06/2015 11:42, Norbert Preining a écrit : > > On Fri, 05 Jun 2015, Élie Roux wrote: > >> right .so? Or do you mean same binaries wouldn't be able to load the > >> same .so file on a different OS? > > > > Yes, that is the problem. We are not making a distinction between OS, > > but ARCH-OS, for examples > > x86_64-linux > > which includes 64bit variants of all the major distributions, some > > old, some new, some strange. > > > > And no, we will not have > > debian-x86_64-linux > > centos-x86_64-linux > > ffobar... > > No way. > > Sure, I'm just trying to understand: do you mean that the x86_64-linux > luatex binary (which is the same under Debian, Suse, etc.) would be able > to load the x86_64-linux .so on Debian but not under Suse? Why would > this happen? > dependencies unjustified, for example. -- luigi
