Good news. Thanks Itamar. DIGY
-----Original Message----- From: itamar.synhers...@gmail.com [mailto:itamar.synhers...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2011 8:23 PM To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4 We have been running some extensive tests >30hrs now against the 2.9.4 branch, and did not detect any leaks. We will have it running a few more days, if you wish to wait for more conclusive findings. On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>wrote: > 2.9.4 would make it in I assume because that will be our next official > release. > > > Sent from my Windows Phone > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Herndon > Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:12 AM > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4 > > > What version is going to make it to nuget? 2.9.4 or 2.9.4g? > ooo totally forgot about nuget. we definitely need to get that setup. > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 6:46 AM, digy digy <digyd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Since it includes some level of divergence from java I committed it to > only > > 2.9.4g branch. > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1930 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-431 > > > > DIGY > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <ita...@code972.com > > >wrote: > > > > > Ok, core compiles, and all tests pass. We are now running long tests to > > > measure memory usage among other things. > > > > > > There is one show stopper tho. There was a patch sent by Matt Warren > for > > > Spatial.Net, that doesn't seem to be in. See > > > http://groups.google.com/group/ravendb/msg/7517f095810c48f3 > > > > > > Any chance you can get it in to 2.9.4? > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <ita...@code972.com > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > Ok, great, we will run RavenDB on top of 2.9.4 in the next few days > and > > > > will let you know how it went. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Michael Herndon < > > > > mhern...@wickedsoftware.net> wrote: > > > > > > > >> I can't tell if the apache git mirror is updated via scheduler or > from > > > >> commit hooks, but its generally stays close to being on par with > svn. > > > >> I'll > > > >> check next time I push something to svn. > > > >> > > > >> But both of those items have made it to the mirror. > > > >> > > > >> - michael > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Digy <digyd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > I don't know how often github mirror is updated. > > > >> > These are the original locations > > > >> > 2.9.4 > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/ > > > >> > 2.9.4g > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net_2_ > > > >> > 9_4g/ > > > >> > > > > >> > Both versions include ThreadLocal fix + Signing. > > > >> > > > > >> > Thanks, > > > >> > DIGY > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > -----Original Message----- > > > >> > From: itamar.synhers...@gmail.com [mailto: > > itamar.synhers...@gmail.com > > > ] > > > >> On > > > >> > Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko > > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 2:34 AM > > > >> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > > > >> > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4 > > > >> > > > > >> > Not a problem, we will test RavenDB on a separate branch, also for > > > >> > potential > > > >> > memory leaks > > > >> > > > > >> > Digy, can you make sure the github mirror contains an updated > 2.9.4 > > > tag > > > >> I > > > >> > can pull from, which includes the latest ThreadLocal fix + the > > > strongly > > > >> > signed patch applied to it? > > > >> > > > > >> > 2011/9/6 Digy <digyd...@gmail.com> > > > >> > > > > >> > > To avoid misunderstanding... > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Community==all Lucene.Net users > > > >> > > > > > >> > > DIGY > > > >> > > > > > >> > > -----Original Message----- > > > >> > > From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com] > > > >> > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:46 PM > > > >> > > To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org' > > > >> > > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4 > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Not bad idea, but I would prefer community's feedback instead of > > > >> testing > > > >> > > against all projects using Lucene.Net > > > >> > > DIGY > > > >> > > > > > >> > > -----Original Message----- > > > >> > > From: Matt Warren [mailto:mattd...@gmail.com] > > > >> > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:09 PM > > > >> > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > > > >> > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4 > > > >> > > > > > >> > > If you want to test it against a large project you could take a > > look > > > >> at > > > >> > how > > > >> > > RavenDB uses it? > > > >> > > > > > >> > > At the moment it's using 2.9.2 ( > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > https://github.com/ayende/ravendb/tree/master/SharedLibs/Sources/Lucene2.9.2 > > > >> > > ) > > > >> > > but if you were to recompile it against 2.9.4 and check that all > > > it's > > > >> > > unit-tests still run that would give you quite a large test > case. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > On 5 September 2011 19:22, Prescott Nasser < > geobmx...@hotmail.com > > > > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Hey All, > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using > it > > > for > > > >> > > > sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we > are > > > >> ready > > > >> > to > > > >> > > > package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have > > > some > > > >> > tasks > > > >> > > > left to take care of? > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > ~Prescott > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.1796 / Virus Database: 2082/4488 - Release Date: 09/10/11
