>We have a folder /trunk/docs, shouldn't this be the place for that? We should have a live site for the documentation that people can browse, similar to the parent project's site. http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_4_0/api/all/index.html. It makes it the documentation more accessible.
The rub is that Sandcastle & SHFB generates html files with guid names, xml & bin files that map to the html files, and aspx pages which acts as the glue. The aspx pages parses the xml/bin files which creates the document site. Thus we're now required to use a server that knows how to serve up aspx pages. If any one knows a way to generate just vanilla html using Sandcastle & SHFB, I could just create a folder per version and push the docs to incubator site. But so far I haven't found an option for this. Keeping the generated help docs inside of source would still require for users to setup a local website just to view the documentation and it adds extra noise in the project. In the release we can provide a zipped file of the site and a generated .chm or even help2/3 files. On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>wrote: > > > > > We should probably fix the ClsCompliance warnings if they have not > already > > been fixed > > > > > > We will have some issues with this - some are marked volatile - which > basically have to be a non-CLS compliant type (as far as my research is > finding) Anyone have thoughts? I went through and replaced sbyte -> Int16, > and uint -> Int64, but I'm having an issue with this, and I don't think > removing the volatile keyword is the right solution. > > > > > find a place to put the generated documentation. > > > We have a folder /trunk/docs, shouldn't this be the place for that? > > > > > > > I remember someone mentioning he/she was unable to access a class from > > VB.NET. The class had public fields & properties with the same names but > > different casing. The fields should be private. > > > > > > > > > > The link in the readme is a dead link: > > http://lucene.apache.org/lucene.net/docs/2.4.0/ The docs generated by > > sandcastle & SHFB require a server that allows aspx files to be executed. > > We should either remove the link from the readme or find the docs a new > > home and update the link. > > > We should generate new documentation and update the link > > > > > > > I'll see if I can setup automating Lucene.Net <http://lucene.net> nuget > > package creation for trunk in the next day or so. > > > > - Michael > > > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com > >wrote: > > > > > Hey all seems like we are set with 2.9.4? Feedback has been positive > and > > > its been quiet. Do we feel ready to vote for a new release? > > > > > > -Prescott > > > > > > Sent from my Windows Phone >
