Big OK from our end Sorry to be nagging on this again, but it would be very nice if you could incorporate https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-431 in 2.9.4 as well. It is one of those bugfixes that really fix a lot more than they can possible break, so I hope this will justify a small divergence from JL.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:29 AM, Michael Herndon < mhern...@wickedsoftware.net> wrote: > We should probably fix the ClsCompliance warnings if they have not already > been fixed & find a place to put the generated documentation. > > I remember someone mentioning he/she was unable to access a class from > VB.NET. The class had public fields & properties with the same names but > different casing. The fields should be private. > > The link in the readme is a dead link: > http://lucene.apache.org/lucene.net/docs/2.4.0/ The docs generated by > sandcastle & SHFB require a server that allows aspx files to be executed. > We should either remove the link from the readme or find the docs a new > home and update the link. > > I'll see if I can setup automating Lucene.Net <http://lucene.net> nuget > package creation for trunk in the next day or so. > > - Michael > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com > >wrote: > > > Hey all seems like we are set with 2.9.4? Feedback has been positive and > > its been quiet. Do we feel ready to vote for a new release? > > > > -Prescott > > > > Sent from my Windows Phone >
