On Tuesday 22 February 2005 17:08, Banoba Ezra wrote: > On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 14:13 +0300, Ziggy David Lubowa wrote: > > > This says there could be numerous other reasons the list isn't > > > "actively" busy. > > Could be that some people are just not sure what to or what not to post > to the LUG list.
Well then a small charter detailing this could help. > I'm sure there are several sysadmins on this list who > do not exactly interact with "Linux" on a daily basis but heavily > interact with other unix distros but run the same *ix apps and without > debate or problem share their questions, answers, experiences, etc on > other subject specific lists or clearly open ended lists. Well, the obvious solution would be to have a list for everything, but being a small community, and us knowing each other, we may end up being on all the lists anyway. Would there be any objections to opening up the list to other UNIX-based operating systems, perhaps even infrastructure (Cisco, HP, Extreme, et al), since at the end of the day, we are trying to learn as much as possible. Or just create another (more general) list? Mark. > > Regards, > Ezra. _______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
