The fundamental problem is that there exists no written charter. For long, it has been left to members to exercise their reasonable judgement but alas!
If folks agree with me and think it is useful, I am willing to draft a charter for discussion on the list. -- Hari On 2010/03/24 6:27 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:- > Guys, this has already been solved. > > If you feel that your post has little to do with the charter > of this list, please add "OT" to your subject, so folk know > it's off-topic and instruct their mailers to do what they > feel is best to said post. > > This debate appears on this list more often than not, and > honestly, is starting to get long-in-the-tooth. > > Suggest we return to regular programming. > > Mark. > > > > _______________________________________________ > LUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug > > LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ > > All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including > attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. > --------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
