yes they do. they do not have to be abused for that, like the US record 
industry is trying to do. (and the patent troll companies)

-- 
rgds,

Reinier Battenberg
Director
Mountbatten Ltd.
+256 758 801 749
www.mountbatten.net



On Monday 09 August 2010 20:09:21 Tim Schofield wrote:
> But its also protecting me as an open source developer isnt it?
> 
> On 09/08/2010, Reinier Battenberg <[email protected]> 
wrote:
> >  Actually it took until after the patent on the steam-engine expired that
> >  the research into petrol engines went into full gear and that engine
> >  was finally invented. So, Kyle, you are not far off.
> >  
> >  And Kyle did not say the US invented it, just that they are abusing it.
> >  For example by extending the duration. Like, Walt Disney is dead &
> >  buried for years now, but someone still owns his copyright.
> >  
> >  That is besides the point. Its not protecting Walt and his great effort
> >  anymore, its just generating cash for shareholders somewhere.
> >  
> >  
> >  
> >  
> >  --
> >  rgds,
> >  
> >  Reinier Battenberg
> >  Director
> >  Mountbatten Ltd.
> >  +256 758 801 749
> >  www.mountbatten.net
> > 
> > On Monday 09 August 2010 15:00:06 Kyle Spencer wrote:
> >  > Tim,
> >  > 
> >  > > As I have said before, theft is the taking of someone elses property
> >  > > without their permission, and you are not denying this is what you
> >  > > do.
> >  > 
> >  > I repeat:
> >  > 
> >  > An act of "theft" requires that someone be denied ownership,
> >  > possession, use, or access to something as a result of the taking.
> >  > 
> >  > Clearly the above has not happened, and therefore nobody is "stealing"
> >  > anything even by American legal standards (the home of bad IP law).
> >  > 
> >  > Making a copy of something != theft -- even in the US.
> >  > 
> >  > FYI: Global IP laws, as they relate to this discussion, are generally
> >  > the result of intense lobbying/corruption of the US legal system by
> >  > large media distribution companies (RIAA/MPAA) who's businesses
> >  > became irrelevant as a result of the Internet.
> >  > 
> >  > These companies do not represent the artists, they represent
> >  > factories, retail business relationships, and license fees which do
> >  > not get passed on to the creative talent behind the works which they
> >  > distribute.
> >  > 
> >  > Essentially, these companies had so much money and clout that they
> >  > were able to alter the US and, to some extent, global legal system in
> >  > order to make their businesses artificially relevant.
> >  > 
> >  > On a side note, I wonder what state the world would be in today if
> >  > horse-drawn carriage manufacturers had pulled off the same stunt in
> >  > order to make automobiles illegal.
> >  > 
> >  > Regards,
> >  > Kyle Spencer
> >  > 
> >  > ----- Original message -----
> >  > 
> >  > > As I have said before, theft is the taking of someone elses property
> >  > > without their permission, and you are not denying this is what you
> >  > > do.
> >  > > 
> >  > > You say, and I believe you that this theft is legal in this country
> >  > > and that only in nice fluffy societies (in other words most of the
> >  > > rest of the world) is this type of theft illegal. Surely then we
> >  > > should be trying to make this country conform to the rest of the
> >  > > world (BTW Kenya, Tanzania, Rwanda are all signatories to the Berne
> >  > > convention so this is most definitely illegal in those countries).
> >  > > 
> >  > > On 9 August 2010 13:03, Badru Ntege (MPP)
> >  > > <[email protected]>
> >  > > 
> >  > > wrote:
> >  > > > > Well I repeat, let us see the evidence that the radio stations
> >  > > > > are stealing, but again if they are it doesn't justify others
> >  > > > > in doing it. Many people steal cars, so does that justify me
> >  > > > > taking yours?
> >  > > > 
> >  > > > Show me a local artist with payment from any FM station for
> >  > > > playing their music.  I think evidence for payment will be
> >  > > > better.  Luck of that evidence will be affirmation of my
> >  > > > statement.
> >  > > > 
> >  > > > > The right point is for people to respect other peoples property,
> >  > > > > but maybe I am wrong :-)
> >  > > > 
> >  > > > You are not wrong but if only life was that simple, we would have
> >  > > > this nice fluffy society where everyone loves everyone and they
> >  > > > are no bad people at all .......etc.   Ooops wakey wakey it is
> >  > > > not that simple and that is why we have laws that are designed to
> >  > > > protect us against each other.  And in this respect the laws of
> >  > > > the land are not sufficient which is why we need to have them
> >  > > > modified and updated to enable us to co-exist and not stifle
> >  > > > growth and development because some archaic law still exists and
> >  > > > does not fit well in the changed world that we live in today.
> >  > > > 
> >  > > > 
> >  > > > So today the musicians might not be able to get payments from the
> >  > > > stations for their works however it promotes their work and means
> >  > > > that they get invited to private performances that give them a
> >  > > > good earning.  Somewhere down the line the two parties have
> >  > > > reached a compromise that works.  However no express permission
> >  > > > is given to the stations night clubs etc to play the music.   Is
> >  > > > this enough ??? No As we work towards a ugandan copyright and IPR
> >  > > > position we need to capture some of this and draft a current law
> >  > > > that works with the changed times.
> >  > > > 
> >  > > > regards
> >  > > > 
> >  > > > 
> >  > > > 
> >  > > > _______________________________________________
> >  > > > LUG mailing list
> >  > > > [email protected]
> >  > > > http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
> >  > > > 
> >  > > > LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
> >  > > > 
> >  > > > All Archives can be found at
> >  > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> >  > > > 
> >  > > > The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them
> >  > > > (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible
> >  > > > for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
> >  > 
> >  > _______________________________________________
> >  > LUG mailing list
> >  > [email protected]
> >  > http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
> >  > 
> >  > LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
> >  > 
> >  > All Archives can be found at
> >  > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> >  > 
> >  > The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them
> >  > (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible
> >  > for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
> >  
> >  _______________________________________________
> >  LUG mailing list
> >  [email protected]
> >  http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
> >  
> >  LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
> >  
> >  All Archives can be found at
> >  http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> >  
> >  The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including
> >  attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any
> >  way. ---------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug

LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to