Absence of proof is not proof of absence? -----Original Message----- From: Arto Wikla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 12:42 PM To: Roman Turovsky Cc: Markus Lutz; [email protected] Subject: [LUTE] Re: jan dismas zelenka and the tiorba
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Roman Turovsky wrote: > There seem to be no convincing counterarguments. The burden of the proof is on the one who claims something. (I am sure there is also an _English_ idiom of saying that... ;-) Arto To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
