Circumstantial evidence will do, especially in the era before closed circuit cameras. I had a good fortune to talk to AB at length about this, and other matters last september, and I believe he might just be right. His erudition is unparallelled, as well as his perspicacity. RT ps. No, he didn't sell me on Liutoforte (I think it useless for lutenists, but could be very useful to veen people off gheetars). ----- Original Message ----- From: "Guy Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Arto Wikla'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Roman Turovsky'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "'Markus Lutz'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 4:50 PM Subject: RE: [LUTE] Re: jan dismas zelenka and the tiorba
> Absence of proof is not proof of absence? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Arto Wikla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 12:42 PM > To: Roman Turovsky > Cc: Markus Lutz; [email protected] > Subject: [LUTE] Re: jan dismas zelenka and the tiorba > > > On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Roman Turovsky wrote: > >> There seem to be no convincing counterarguments. > > The burden of the proof is on the one who claims something. > (I am sure there is also an _English_ idiom of saying that... ;-) > > Arto > > > > To get on or off this list see list information at > http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html > > >
