Indeed (having a perusal myself, as we "speak").
RT
> "Arto Wikla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>>
>> On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Roman Turovsky wrote:
>>
>> > There seem to be no convincing counterarguments.
>>
>> The burden of the proof is on the one who claims something.
>> (I am sure there is also an _English_ idiom of saying that... ;-)
>
> The burden of proof rests with the claimant, that much is true. Mr
> Buguete has shown adequate evidence IMHO that the instrument in question
> was the one which was used by Weiss. Cf Andre Burguete, Die
> Wiederauffindung der Theorbe von Silvius Leopold Weiß (sic!), in:
> Theatrum Instrumentorum Dresdense, ed. by W. Steude and H.-G. Ottenberg,
> Schriften zur mitteldeutschen Musikgeschichte vol. 11, Schneverdingen
> 2003 (Germany), pp. 65-94.
> --
> Mathias
>
>
>
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>
