A few, at least: http://www.muslib.se/ebibliotek/boije/pdf/Boije%20502.pdf http://www.muslib.se/ebibliotek/boije/pdf/Boije%201051.pdf http://www.muslib.se/ebibliotek/boije/pdf/Boije%20284.pdf http://www.muslib.se/ebibliotek/boije/pdf/Boije%20284.pdf http://www.muslib.se/ebibliotek/boije/pdf/Boije%20284.pdf http://www2.kb.dk/elib/noder/rischel/RiBS0149.pdf
Best. Chris. >>> "Eugene C. Braig IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 7/15/2008 3:53 PM >>> At 08:24 AM 7/13/2008, Christopher Stetson wrote: >Well, I would think the first question would be what your (or your >instructor's) definition of "fantasy" is. The term seems to have fallen >out of favor early in the 17th c. I see your point that many rhapsodic bits could be considered as "fantasy" in spite of title, and that the term was perhaps not so commonly used later as it was in the era when purely instrumental music first began moving away from dance forms, but I'm not so certain I would contend that the term fell out of favor in the early 17th c; "fantasy", "fantasia", "phantasie", "phantasiestücke", etc. found occasional use throughout. Consider the occasional lute works by Weiss or Kellner; the fortepiano works of C.P.E. Bach, Mozart, or Schumann; the guitar works by Sor, Coste, Legnani, etc. They're there. Best, Eugene To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
