Hi, all. Probably this should move off list, not being lute related, and since it appears Omer is satisfied with his choice of Luis Milan. But to finish up: I just went through quickly, Eugene, and picked some of the composers you mentioned then looked for fantas** in the title. I don't know if Sor Op. 7 is in there, either. If you recommend it, I'll look.
While wonderful, those collections are subject to the proclivities 80 years ago of the collectors. I haven't played any of those pieces; my tastes run pretty strongly toward America in the 19th c. My impression was that Omer wanted post-17th, but I also don't have the original post easily at hand. Now, though, apparently a moot point, except for our discussion. Best, Chris. >>> "Eugene C. Braig IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 7/16/2008 8:13 am >>> That's a nice few. Of Sor's, my favorite is probably Op.7 (it's almost certainly on the Boije site someplace, but I don't have time to dig it up at the moment). However, I thought Omer wanted to avoid 19th-c. works. (I don't have the original request any longer.) Eugene At 09:49 PM 7/15/2008, Christopher Stetson wrote: >A few, at least: >http://www.muslib.se/ebibliotek/boije/pdf/Boije%20502.pdf >http://www.muslib.se/ebibliotek/boije/pdf/Boije%201051.pdf >http://www.muslib.se/ebibliotek/boije/pdf/Boije%20284.pdf >http://www.muslib.se/ebibliotek/boije/pdf/Boije%20284.pdf >http://www.muslib.se/ebibliotek/boije/pdf/Boije%20284.pdf >http://www2.kb.dk/elib/noder/rischel/RiBS0149.pdf > >Best. >Chris. > > >>> "Eugene C. Braig IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 7/15/2008 3:53 PM >>> >At 08:24 AM 7/13/2008, Christopher Stetson wrote: > >Well, I would think the first question would be what your (or your > >instructor's) definition of "fantasy" is. The term seems to have >fallen > >out of favor early in the 17th c. > >I see your point that many rhapsodic bits could be considered as >"fantasy" >in spite of title, and that the term was perhaps not so commonly used >later >as it was in the era when purely instrumental music first began moving >away >from dance forms, but I'm not so certain I would contend that the term >fell >out of favor in the early 17th c; "fantasy", "fantasia", "phantasie", >"phantasiestücke", etc. found occasional use throughout. Consider the >occasional lute works by Weiss or Kellner; the fortepiano works of >C.P.E. >Bach, Mozart, or Schumann; the guitar works by Sor, Coste, Legnani, >etc. They're there. > >Best, >Eugene > > > >To get on or off this list see list information at >http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
