I'm a little late here but... Boije does indeed have the Sor Op. 7 Fantasia. (One of my faves too, though I prefer Op. 59) http://www.muslib.se/ebibliotek/boije/Boije_s.htm
However, I think Omer said he was looking for pre- 1700's. Omer, try Chris' advice and tune the G to F# and you can play all the vihuela rep: Milan, Mudarra, Narvaez, Valderrabano, Daza, Pisador, Fuenllana, Bermudo. steve gottlieb On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Christopher Stetson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, all. > Probably this should move off list, not being lute related, and since > it appears Omer is satisfied with his choice of Luis Milan. > > But to finish up: I just went through quickly, Eugene, and picked some > of the composers you mentioned then looked for fantas** in the title. I > don't know if Sor Op. 7 is in there, either. If you recommend it, I'll > look. > > While wonderful, those collections are subject to the proclivities 80 > years ago of the collectors. I haven't played any of those pieces; my > tastes run pretty strongly toward America in the 19th c. My impression > was that Omer wanted post-17th, but I also don't have the original post > easily at hand. Now, though, apparently a moot point, except for our > discussion. > > Best, > Chris. > > >>> "Eugene C. Braig IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 7/16/2008 8:13 am >>> > That's a nice few. Of Sor's, my favorite is probably Op.7 (it's almost > > certainly on the Boije site someplace, but I don't have time to dig it > up > at the moment). However, I thought Omer wanted to avoid 19th-c. works. > (I > don't have the original request any longer.) > > Eugene > > At 09:49 PM 7/15/2008, Christopher Stetson wrote: > >A few, at least: > >http://www.muslib.se/ebibliotek/boije/pdf/Boije%20502.pdf > >http://www.muslib.se/ebibliotek/boije/pdf/Boije%201051.pdf > >http://www.muslib.se/ebibliotek/boije/pdf/Boije%20284.pdf > >http://www.muslib.se/ebibliotek/boije/pdf/Boije%20284.pdf > >http://www.muslib.se/ebibliotek/boije/pdf/Boije%20284.pdf > >http://www2.kb.dk/elib/noder/rischel/RiBS0149.pdf > > > >Best. > >Chris. > > > > >>> "Eugene C. Braig IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 7/15/2008 3:53 PM >>> > >At 08:24 AM 7/13/2008, Christopher Stetson wrote: > > >Well, I would think the first question would be what your (or your > > >instructor's) definition of "fantasy" is. The term seems to have > >fallen > > >out of favor early in the 17th c. > > > >I see your point that many rhapsodic bits could be considered as > >"fantasy" > >in spite of title, and that the term was perhaps not so commonly used > >later > >as it was in the era when purely instrumental music first began > moving > >away > >from dance forms, but I'm not so certain I would contend that the > term > >fell > >out of favor in the early 17th c; "fantasy", "fantasia", "phantasie", > >"phantasiestucke", etc. found occasional use throughout. Consider the > >occasional lute works by Weiss or Kellner; the fortepiano works of > >C.P.E. > >Bach, Mozart, or Schumann; the guitar works by Sor, Coste, Legnani, > >etc. They're there. > > > >Best, > >Eugene > > > > > > > >To get on or off this list see list information at > >http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html<http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html> > > > --
