Yes, would also love to hear some of these Piazzolla works on lute.   
Congratulations on the new 8 course Larson instrument (would be interested to 
know which of his models you got).
-Ned
On Mar 29, 2011, at 12:11 PM, Daniel Winheld wrote:

> Excellent discussion- as to modern classical guitar "vs" renaissance 
> lute; some exchanges work, some don't. I've been testing these waters 
> very intensely since getting a new 8 course from Dan Larson. 
> Unbelievably resonant instrument, depth of response beyond anything 
> I've ever owned or played previously. The Villa-Lobos Etude #1 is a 
> great arpeggio study for thumb-index alternation, either thumb out or 
> in; but I would never play it on the lute in concert. A surprising 
> number of Villa-Lobos' other guitar works do sound good on this 
> particular lute (differences in individual instruments can affect 
> what works/doesn't work almost as much as different species of 
> instrument) -and of course, as Martin notes, you run right off the 
> rails technically with many pieces. But it's good training to dance 
> one's way right up to the sound hole playing the works that test & 
> extend the lute's limits, but don't quite exceed it.
> 
> All technical stumbling blocks resolved, it seems to still be a 
> "cultural" thing; the European lute family is and no doubt will 
> always be- for the most part- a back-from-the-dead, loving retrieval 
> of our nearly lost instrumental musical heritage, redolent of 
> particular times and places, not mention musical-social associations. 
> In our minds, at least. One violates- or just pushes- these important 
> values/associations very carefully. Again, for my own amusement, I 
> have found that five of the dozen or so guitar arrangements of Astor 
> Piazzolla sound brilliant on the lute; actually even better in some 
> ways. (Lute sound- even with all gut stringing- cuts like an arrow 
> vs. guitar sound- smashes through like a bullet. Perfect for Tango) 
> -but I may never perform them in concert. A relevant  and important 
> point; none of these works by Piazzolla were actually written for 
> guitar- they have been played on everything from solo bandoneon, 
> guitar, or piano, to quintets and full orchestrations. Music of a 
> certain universal plasticity (like so much of Bach's suites & 
> partitas) is fair game for many different modes of presentation.
> 
> But what "should" be the lute's cultural range- technical/sonic range 
> being easily quantifiable- is a delicate, thorny aspect of this 
> discussion.
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> A few thoughts off the top of my head (not as far up as it was):
>> 
>> I would say to a composer - listen carefully to the sound of a 
>> proper lute strung with gut strings.  You will hear the difference 
>> between that and the modern guitar.
>> 
>> Also, bear in mind that although pushing boundaries can be 
>> interesting, the lute is historically quite limited in range - in 
>> terms of the fingerboard, there are only eight tied frets, after 
>> that you're up in the gods.  Unless you're writing for baroque lute 
>> of course, in which case you've got a couple of extra frets.
>> 
>> Think about octaves.  They were usually ignored by the intabulators 
>> of old, but they were there - so when composing, you really have to 
>> think about what kind of octave doubling (however subtle) is 
>> acceptable.
>> 
>> Temperament is another issue.  The old guys mave have used some 
>> approximation to equal temperament, but that doesn't necessarily 
>> equate to total freedom in terms of modulation, or the way the open 
>> strings of the instrument resonate.  Some notes are more equal than 
>> others.
>> 
>> Special effects (harmonics, tapping the soundboard, etc) are not, as 
>> far as we know,  part of historical lute technique.  It is therefore 
>> a matter of taste whether to extend the "normal" technique of the 
>> instrument in various ways, but there is always a danger of making 
>> it sound like something it isn't.
>> 
>> Historically most lutenists were obsessed by trying to reproduce 
>> vocal polyphony.  Perhaps the organ has more in common with the lute 
>> than the guitar....
>> 
>> Best wishes,
>> 
>> Martin
>> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> 
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



Reply via email to