Actually we do have some of them and this is one of the topics that I have 
dealt with in my thesis (modern and contemporary Lute music), it's a very 
interesting research that goes on, looking for new aspects still to be dealt 
with 
Best regards to all 
Silvia
Inviato da iPhone

> Il giorno 15 mar 2018, alle ore 12:13, Matthew Daillie 
> <[email protected]> ha scritto:
> 
>> On 15/03/2018 01:45, Ron Andrico wrote:
>>  I don't usually bother to respond to your sniping noises,
>> 
>>    There is no stature to be gained by treating the work of others with
>>    disdain while claiming a morally superior position
> 
> Goodness Ron , those are comments that could definitely have granted you a 
> valuable source of introspection. The art of projection never ceases to amaze 
> me.
> 
> Gilbert Isbin's email was quite belligerent in its questioning. My post was a 
> straightforward answer. I have nothing against lute players composing and 
> performing their own music, I just don't wish to be aggressively interrogated 
> as to why I'm not buying or playing it.
> 
> I never said that I prefer 'old music', just that I don't see much 'new' lute 
> music out there to compete with the production of the great masters. We seem 
> to be forgetting that the lute was THE instrument of its age and that many of 
> the works which have come down to us are the acme of musical production.
> 
> I cannot think of a major composer today who only writes for one instrument. 
> If we look at 20th century music, very often the great instrumentalists 
> commissioned works from contemporary distinguished composers. Maybe we need 
> one of today's top lutenists to do the same, just as Julian Bream 
> commissioned Benjamin Britten to write Nocturnal for guitar (based on 
> Dowland's 'Come Heavy Sleep') over 50 years ago. The filter of time has not 
> yet finished its job and we do not know what works will survive for 
> prosperity but we can look back at the 20th century and find an endless list 
> of great composers (Bartok, Berio, Britten, Crumb, Dutilleux, Gubaidulina, 
> Kurtag, Ligeti, Messiaen, Prokofiev, Rihm, Shnittke, Shostakovich, 
> Stravinsky, to name but a few). Maybe we need a composer of their ilk to 
> write for the lute before there is a real renaissance of its music.
> 
> Then there is the captivating experience of playing music which is 500 years 
> old and yet speaks to us directly with ineffable force and beauty. That 
> fascination, in conjunction with the historical, artistic and musicological 
> riches which accompany our music-making, are surely the main reasons why most 
> of us took up the lute in the first place.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Matthew
> 
> 
> 
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



Reply via email to