On 7/10/2014 5:41 PM, Peter Ross wrote: > Overall I hear a lot of "btrfs is having this or that issues" which I > never followed up properly. But it makes me wary.
I don't know if I could ever trust BTRFS ... I want to, but I see too many issues, far too often and file system problems are the last ones I want due to a buggy implementation or failed feature adjustments that just plain break things... > I am using ZFS on FreeBSD for at least 3 years in production now (and > upgrade the kernel regularly when needed) without any issues. > > Besides of early problems with nearly full ZFS and memory which were known. > > On both fronts there seems to be improvement. E.g. I have 92% full ZFS > volumes which are still performing - there was a 80% "warning" in the > past, and I run ZFS on 3GB and 4GB RAM boxes and do not see issues. How much storage? RAM was always a problem with ZFS, it seems to be a problem of the past now though and ZFS seems so much better. Cheers A. _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
