Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> My problem with Levons code that I feel it is too static. With
| Lars> the scheme Andre and I propose it is very easy to load function
| Lars> os demand or have them created in a scriptlanguage. (or as a
| Lars> named keyboard macro).
|
| Then we should come up with a scheme which makes documentation and
| debugging as easy as what John proposes. Let's face it: the current
| scheme is awful debugging-wise. Every time I need to find a function
| do-foo, I go in lyxaction to find what the LFUN name is (of course, it
| is LFUN_BAR, not LFUN_FOO), then go in LyXFunc where there is only a
| small wrapper around something which is somewhere else...
|
| One could mostly try to auto-generate a reference manual from a format
| similar to what John proposes.
I think that can be just as easily don in the scheme I propose.
Each LFUN is a function Levon and I agree on that, afaisi we disagree
on how to store the LFUNS and how to dispatch them.
Lgb
