John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 15 Jan 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > My problem with Levons code that I feel it is too static. With the
| > scheme Andre and I propose it is very easy to load function os demand
| > or have them created in a scriptlanguage. (or as a named keyboard macro).
| >
| > This is probably possible with Levons scheme as well...but...
| >
| > Lgb
|
| sure it is, that's what the lyxfunction constructor is for ! Just add
| another add() method to lf_container for non-pseudo-action functions (and
| maybe the special casing of functions < LFUN_LAST_STATIC should go, and
| just use a container).
I would have wanted this as a container anyway...
| You can have dynamically-numbered functions, you can reference them by
| string name, etc. still. It's trivial in fact.
but this would be the case for the string based approach also I think.
| But I am clearly on the losing side of a battle here, so I think I'll move
| on ;)
Let's not kill this discussion too soon. I am open to arguments.
Lgb
