On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > As Vincent noted, the problem here was that the patch was apparently not > tested before being backported to 2.0.x branch. I do not see a relation to > 2.1.1-staging here. The problem is that we apparently sometimes forget how > different the code in 2.0.x and 2.1.x is in many places. So if we backport, > we should not just check if a backport compiles (or even only if it > applies), but also test the functionality. > > I wonder if the fix works as intended with the Mac in 2.0.x. > I wonder wether it is a good idea to backport things to 2.0.8 _before_ it is in master. You can be almost sure that noone has tested or even tried or maybe even looked at the patch if it is only in 2.2-staging (except the branch maintainer maybe). Vincent
