Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > The problem is that I was reluctant to have this in 2.1.0rc1. It was not > tested, and it touches core functionality. Then, people screamed this has > to go into 2.1.0rc2, but in the mean time it is already applied to 2.0.8 > ?!?
IMO there should not be a rc2 unless a really severe problem turns up with rc1. Georg
