On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> wrote:
> On 04/28/2014 06:10 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta <tomm...@lyx.org>wrote:
>
>> On 28/04/14 19:37, Patrick O'Keeffe wrote:
>>
>> I don't personally see any advantage to composing emails in Lyx. OP
>> suggested it because of the beautiful formatting provided by LaTeX but HTML
>> isn't capable of such beauty. If you need the aesthetics, you're stuck
>> emailing it as an attachment anyway.
>>
>>
>> Forget about beauty, this is about functionality and convenience:
>> copying from LyX (trunk), I can send you this (I hope you can display it
>> correctly, at least it shows up OK while I'm composing it):
>>
>> - For each hosts pair ( j 1 , j 2 ) ∈ H × H , a set P j 1 , j 2 of
>> interconnection paths may be available and usable, where each path p ∈ P j
>> 1 , j 2 is associated with the sequence P j 1 , j 2 ,p of its L j 1 , j 2
>> ,p links P j 1 , j 2 ,p ={ ( a j 1 , j 2 ,p,1 , b j 1 , j 2 ,p,1 ), … ,( a
>> j 1 , j 2 ,p, L j 1 , j 2 ,p , b j 1 , j 2 ,p, L j 1 , j 2 ,p ) } ⊂ L .
>>
>>
>> Leaving the meaning aside, my question is: how can I write this in
>> Thunderbird? The only way is to attach the .lyx document, or an export of
>> it, and it takes just more time to do that, rather than copy/paste.
>>
>>
> Tommaso,
>
> I don't know what you see in Thunderbird, but I can assure you that in
> gmail your formula is barely legible. Wouldn't it be easier to "typeset" it
> in ascii?
>
>
> FWIW, it is perfect here in Thunderbird.
>
Too bad for gmail then. I wonder if other webmail clients behave as
horribly.
S.
--
__________________________________________________
Stefano Franchi
Associate Research Professor
Department of Hispanic Studies Ph: +1 (979) 845-2125
Texas A&M University Fax: +1 (979) 845-6421
College Station, Texas, USA
stef...@tamu.edu
http://stefano.cleinias.org
