Am 29.04.2014 um 18:20 schrieb Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org>:
> On 04/28/2014 06:10 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta <tomm...@lyx.org> wrote:
>> On 28/04/14 19:37, Patrick O'Keeffe wrote:
>>> I don't personally see any advantage to composing emails in Lyx. OP
>>> suggested it because of the beautiful formatting provided by LaTeX but HTML
>>> isn't capable of such beauty. If you need the aesthetics, you're stuck
>>> emailing it as an attachment anyway.
>>
>> Forget about beauty, this is about functionality and convenience: copying
>> from LyX (trunk), I can send you this (I hope you can display it correctly,
>> at least it shows up OK while I'm composing it):
>> • For each hosts pair ( j 1 , j 2 ) ∈ H × H , a set P j 1 , j 2 of
>> interconnection paths may be available and usable, where each path p ∈ P j 1
>> , j 2 is associated with the sequence P j 1 , j 2 ,p of its L j 1 , j 2 ,p
>> links P j 1 , j 2 ,p ={ ( a j 1 , j 2 ,p,1 , b j 1 , j 2 ,p,1 ), … ,( a j 1
>> , j 2 ,p, L j 1 , j 2 ,p , b j 1 , j 2 ,p, L j 1 , j 2 ,p ) } ⊂ L .
>>
>> Leaving the meaning aside, my question is: how can I write this in
>> Thunderbird? The only way is to attach the .lyx document, or an export of
>> it, and it takes just more time to do that, rather than copy/paste.
>>
>>
>> Tommaso,
>>
>> I don't know what you see in Thunderbird, but I can assure you that in gmail
>> your formula is barely legible. Wouldn't it be easier to "typeset" it in
>> ascii?
>
> FWIW, it is perfect here in Thunderbird.
The same with Apple-Mail.
Stephan
