On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta <tomm...@lyx.org
<mailto:tomm...@lyx.org>> wrote:
On 28/04/14 19:37, Patrick O'Keeffe wrote:
I don't personally see any advantage to composing emails in Lyx.
OP suggested it because of the beautiful formatting provided by
LaTeX but HTML isn't capable of such beauty. If you need the
aesthetics, you're stuck emailing it as an attachment anyway.
Forget about beauty, this is about functionality and convenience:
copying from LyX (trunk), I can send you this (I hope you can
display it correctly, at least it shows up OK while I'm composing
it):
* For each hosts pair ( j 1 , j 2 ) ? H × H , a set P j 1 , j 2
of interconnection paths may be available and usable, where
each path p ? P j 1 , j 2 is associated with the sequence P j
1 , j 2 ,p of its L j 1 , j 2 ,p links P j 1 , j 2 ,p ={ ( a
j 1 , j 2 ,p,1 , b j 1 , j 2 ,p,1 ), ... ,( a j 1 , j 2 ,p, L
j 1 , j 2 ,p , b j 1 , j 2 ,p, L j 1 , j 2 ,p ) } ? L .
Leaving the meaning aside, my question is: how can I write this
in Thunderbird? The only way is to attach the .lyx document, or
an export of it, and it takes just more time to do that, rather
than copy/paste.
Tommaso,
I don't know what you see in Thunderbird, but I can assure you that
in gmail your formula is barely legible. Wouldn't it be easier to
"typeset" it in ascii?
