William Adams wrote:
> I'll take your word for it, but as I noted, it's hard to take
> seriuosly when the person who wrote the program won't make use of all
> of its features.
Automatic care for widows and orphans is discouraged in the
serious typography, because impossible. It usually involves some
stretching of in-between-lines space. Other means of the
resolving issues (aka Knuth's algorithm) are not 100% successfull
(compare with TeX which doesn't always break lines correctly), so
some w/o remains.
So, the author included the feature, but he preferred not to use
it for this document. What's wrong with that?
Matej
--
Matej Cepl, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
138 Highland Ave. #10, Somerville, Ma 02143, (617) 623-1488
There is no reason to suppose that most human beings are engaged
in maximizing anything unless it be unhappiness, and even this
with incomplete success.
-- Ronald Coase
Introduction to ``The Firm, the Market, and the Law''
