Matej Cepl responded:
(to my criticizing the lout-created docs for nonpareil)
>Automatic care for widows and orphans is discouraged in the
>serious typography, because impossible. It usually involves some
>stretching of in-between-lines space.
Take a look at how LaTeX 3 handles it. Alternately, I really would
like to see a batch pagination tool which would make fixing them
easier (or even allow one to plan for them in advance for straight
text composition).
>Other means of the
>resolving issues (aka Knuth's algorithm) are not 100% successfull
>(compare with TeX which doesn't always break lines correctly), so
>some w/o remains.
>So, the author included the feature, but he preferred not to use
>it for this document. What's wrong with that?
It seems to me that a person who is advocating a typographic tool
should strive to demonstrate skill at typography and an awareness of
it, even if that means some hand-work.
William
--
William Adams, publishing specialist
voice - 717-731-6707 | Fax - 717-731-6708
www.atlis.com
- Re: Lyx and style Mark Carroll
- Re: Lyx and style Giovanni Biczó
- Re: Lyx and style William Adams
- Re: Lyx and style Giovanni Biczó
- Re: Lyx and style Matej Cepl
- Re: Lyx and style William Adams
- Re: Lyx and style Mark Carroll
- Re: Lyx and style Matej Cepl
- Re: Lyx and style William Adams
- Re: Lyx and style Matej Cepl
- Re: Lyx and style William Adams
- Re: Lyx and style Giovanni Biczó
- Re: Lyx and style Mark Carroll
- Re: Lyx and style Giovanni Biczó
