Paul A. Rubin wrote: >>> dvi2ps: FATAL-- can't find DVI file "6499i.dvi" > > I interpret that to mean that dvi2ps was started by LyX (which in > particular means that LyX was able to find dvi2ps), but that it was given > an incorrect name for the DVI file (or else was not given the correct > path to the DVI file).
The problem seems to be the shell translating $$ to the process id 6499, and leaving the i untouched. I.e., LyX in not translating $$i, but handing the string $$i to dvi2ps. Soren, what happend if you put simply "dvi2ps" instead of "dvi2ps $$i" as the printer command? Alfredo
