Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > Paul A. Rubin wrote: > >>>> dvi2ps: FATAL-- can't find DVI file "6499i.dvi" >> >> I interpret that to mean that dvi2ps was started by LyX (which in >> particular means that LyX was able to find dvi2ps), but that it was given >> an incorrect name for the DVI file (or else was not given the correct >> path to the DVI file). > > The problem seems to be the shell translating $$ to the process id 6499, > and leaving the i untouched. I.e., LyX in not translating $$i, but handing > the string $$i to dvi2ps. > > Soren, what happend if you put simply "dvi2ps" instead of "dvi2ps $$i" as > the printer command? > > Alfredo ...makes no difference, but look at my other reply to Paul ...
Soren
