On Wednesday 23 July 2008 19:24:16 Pavel Sanda wrote: > this depends on what you master. i'm used on the bunch of small unix > utilities so i gave that sed example. if you know python you will do in > python. my point was not propose the best tools but to groan and moan about > xml :)
FWIW this chunk is from one of my shell scripts: echo $1 for i in {8..40} do echo -n '.' w=`printf "%.2d0" $i` f="dfa-$1-$w.dat" ./dfa -s -w $w < $1.dat | ./join-lag.py -l $w -r $1.dates > $f cut -f1,2 $f | join -a1 dfa.dat - > tmp.dat mv tmp.dat dfa.dat done So as you can see I know more than python. :-) And yes I know this only works with bash, and that is OK with me. :-) My point is that it is alright to use the small tools of the trade but we can do better because lyx documents are richer than just pure text. I am not saying that your usage is wrong what I claim is that we need better script tools to handle lyx documents. Those tools should be stable across lyx versions and should not depend of any particular file format. > pavel -- José Abílio