In order to keep these kind of OSXFuse/Tuxera/Fuse4x/whatever
questions out of threads like this, I created a new discussion thread
for exactly these types of questions.
Please continue that discussion there, and keep this one clean.

http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse/browse_thread/thread/856d073819b35586

On Aug 17, 1:49 pm, Benjamin Fleischer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Kay,
>
> The official MacFUSE project is dead. There have been several attempts by 
> various people or companies to provide newer unofficial versions of MacFUSE 
> which fix various bugs. The most popular build of these (at least on this 
> mailing list) is Tuxera's MacFUSE 2.2.0/1 which "works" on OS X 10.5 through 
> 10.7. You won't be able to install these unofficial versions through the 
> original MacFUSE's update mechanism. There are some known bugs:
>
> (1) If you mount a filesystem without the allow_others option you might run 
> into problems with Finder. Copying or Moving files might not work due to a 
> permission issue. This could be considered a bug in Lion. In any case we need 
> to work around it.
>
> (2) Under rare conditions there seems to be a deadlock when running a 64 bit 
> kernel (default under Lion) which leads to the filesystem being unmounted. 
> This particularly happens with EncFS, if you move lots of files.
>
> Bryan's version fixes these issues but he has not released the source yet. 
> Nobody had a chance to look at his patch.
>
> OSXFUSE aims to be the new MacFUSE. It is compatible with MacFUSE filesystems 
> and can be considered a drop-in replacement. The newest version of OSXFUSE is 
> 2.3.1. Most of its code is identical to Tuxera's MacFSUE 2.2.0/1 release and 
> it suffers from the same issues listed above. At least issue (1) will be 
> fixed in the next update. OSXFUSE is in beta phase at the moment.  
>
> To complete the picture: There is also Fuse4X which aims to be very close to 
> the Linux version of FUSE but requires MacFUSE filesystems to be recompiled 
> in order to work.
>
> Regards,
> Benjamin
>
> Am 17.08.2011 um 12:30 schrieb offroadbiker:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Where's the diference between MacFuse and OSXFUSE?
> > Is OSXFUSE the new MacFuse?
>
> > And how can I be sure that I always get the latest version?
> > Cause in main settings (OSX 10.6.8) I see "installed version 2.1.9
> > (beta)" and "Update Available 2.1.5"! :O
>
> > Should I install now Bryan's MacFUSE 2.2.2 or OSXFUSE 2.3.0?
> > I'm really confused what to do. :(
>
> > By the side I wanna update to OSX Lion - does MacFuse/OSXFUSE work
> > with Lion?
>
> > Sorry 4 my questions but I'm no developer and no native english
> > speaker.
>
> > Greets from Germany!
>
> > On 13 Aug., 20:02, Benjamin Fleischer <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Bryan, don't you think it would be more helpful if you released the source 
> >> of your build? This way your patch could be integrated into MacFUSE 
> >> (Tuxera)/OSXFUSE/Fuse4X.
>
> >> Tuxera's MacFUSE has a working update machanism as has OSXFUSE. I don't 
> >> know about Fuse4X. Having additional builds does not help at all. Nobody 
> >> can keep track of them. Just my two cents.
>
> >> Regards,
> >> Benjamin
>
> >> Am 13.08.2011 um 19:25 schrieb Joe Auty:
>
> >>> I'm really confused with how osxfuse, fuse4x, and macfuse now 
> >>> intersect... I thought with the last tuxera build of MacFuse that it was 
> >>> officially abandoned?
>
> >>> On Aug 13, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Bryan Pham <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>>> Hey guys,
>
> >>>> This version fixes
>
> >>>> 1) Under heavy i/o macfuse force unmount on 64-bit kernel.
> >>>> 2) On Lion, Finder require allow_other to mount (security risk,) I've 
> >>>> made modification where this is no longer needed.
>
> >>>> See 
> >>>> dmg:https://wgw.oxygencloud.com/weblink/link?c=ff80808131bf94180131c3cba0...
> >>>> --
> >>>> Best Regards,
>
> >>>>http://www.linkedin.com/in/bryantripham
> >>>> Bryan Tri Pham
>
> >>>> --
> >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >>>> Groups "MacFUSE" group.
> >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >>>> [email protected].
> >>>> For more options, visit this group 
> >>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en.
>
> >>> --
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> >>> "MacFUSE" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >>> [email protected].
> >>> For more options, visit this group 
> >>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "MacFUSE" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacFUSE" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en.

Reply via email to