Jerry,

Thanks, so good to have you helping so many of us.

John R.


On Jul 7, 2004, at 7:10 PM, Jerry Yeager wrote:

> I will have to take a shot in the dark here.
>
> Probably Henri or one of the others can correct me if I am wrong on 
> parts (or all) of this, but I am remembering that Java for Cocoa is 
> for apps that you download to your desktop and run (they use Java 
> code). The other Java stuff is for internet gizmos that run in your 
> browser. The windoze approach to Java is of course different (M$ and 
> Sun keep battling in and out of court on this one) and the thing that 
> you download for windoze IE is handled differently than for other 
> platforms because of the way M$ uses IE to run its operating system. 
> So the sloppy 1.4.2 version check would work in windoze and no where 
> else (complaints for the rest of the Java using world that Henri 
> noted).
>
>                       Jerry
>
> On Jul 07, 2004, at 5:20 PM, John Robinson wrote:
>
>> Hen,
>>
>> You are right, I did type it wrong, and it should be an = instead of 
>> a +.  I also bet this is an older version.  The site will work with 
>> Internet Explorer on the Windows side, with a plugin from Microsoft, 
>> but so far we can't get it to work with Sun.
>>
>> Jerry,
>>
>> Possibly you have hit on it.  I ran the list as you suggested, the 
>> first is Shockwave Flash, then Shockwave for Director.  Then the Java 
>> Plug-in says it is 1.3.1 (CFM), then another Java Plug-in that is 
>> 1.3.1, and finally a Java for Cocoa plug-in that is 1.4.2.
>>
>> Then there is a long list of QuickTime plug-in's.  (I have QuickTime 
>> 6.5.1 Pro installed)
>>
>> I can't send an attachment showing the list, hopefully this will 
>> help.  Do the Java 1.3.1's make this the problem, or since I have the 
>> 1.4.2 why does the dialogue box say I need it?
>>
>> I downloaded the 1.4.2 drivers directly from Sun and installed them 
>> when we were trying to troubleshoot this a couple weeks ago.
>>
>> Any suggestions would really be appreciated, and I thank you both for 
>> your replies.
>>
>> John R.
>>
>>
>> On Jul 7, 2004, at 4:32 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Unsure exactly. The + is very odd in there as googling I nearly 
>>> always see
>>> something like:
>>>
>>> application/x-java-applet;jpi-version=1.4.2
>>>
>>> Could you have typo'd that? + does sometimes mean > 1.4.2, so it 
>>> could be
>>> something they've done (or they could have typo'd it).
>>>
>>> Quite possibly their applet-html is out of date. To put an applet in 
>>> a
>>> webpage, Java developers have had to use increasingly cryptic 
>>> incantations
>>> and it seems that an older incantation no longer works with the
>>> jpi-version or something. Googling, I can see various complaints 
>>> from the
>>> Linux-Mozilla users.
>>>
>>> Another possibility is that OS X doesn't pick up 1.4.2 but only 
>>> 1.4.2_03
>>> or something silly. These are the kinds of reasons I steer clear of 
>>> applet
>>> jobs :) Painful world.
>>>
>>> Hen
>>>
>>> On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, John Robinson wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I previously sent this out with a snapshot of the screen, but since 
>>>> I
>>>> didn't get a copy I am assuming the server won't accept attachments.
>>>> At the bottom the note I sent before I will type what the Safari
>>>> Dialogue said.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Friends,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am attaching a screenshot of what I get when I try to log onto a 
>>>> site
>>>> I really need.  This site is written with Microsoft Java (UGH), but
>>>> supposedly they have a version for Sun Java, but even though I have
>>>> talked to several of their tech. people they don't know why this
>>>> doesn't work.
>>>>
>>>> When I use Internet Explorer, Netscape, or others I don't get the
>>>> dialogue box as you see here with Safari, but the site doesn't work.
>>>>
>>>> I have tired using the debugging feature in Safari, and trying to 
>>>> mimic
>>>> a PC, but that also doesn't work.
>>>>
>>>> Anyone know what the problem might be?
>>>>
>>>> I sure appreciate the help.
>>>>
>>>> John Robinson
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is the dialogue:
>>>>
>>>> "Safari cannot find the Internet plug-in.
>>>>
>>>> The page ""has content of MIME type
>>>> "application/x-java-applet;jpi-version+1.4.2.  Because you don't 
>>>> have a
>>>> plug-in installed for this MIME type, this content can't be 
>>>> displayed"
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> | The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will
>>> | be July 27. The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>.
>>> | List posting address: <mailto:macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu>
>>> | List Web page: <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> | The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will
>> | be July 27. The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>.
>> | List posting address: <mailto:macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu>
>> | List Web page: <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup>
>>
>>
> -----------------------------------
> Someday, I will come up with a clever signature line. I am not sure if 
> I will use it or not, but I will come up with one.
>
>
>
> | The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will
> | be July 27. The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>.
> | List posting address: <mailto:macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu>
> | List Web page: <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup>
>



| The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will
| be July 27. The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>.
| List posting address: <mailto:macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu>
| List Web page: <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup>


Reply via email to