C'mon Jerry. Don't you have any compassion for Ward's lip? I put this 
discussion behind me until I have something concrete to support my 
claims. Here's three basic and fairly inexpensive ways I know of to 
measure fluid levels.
1. mechanical - The dipstick for measuring the oil in your car.
2. electronic - The variable capacitor (or resistor) in your car's gas 
tank. I don't know if that's been updated or not.
3. optical - A light source on one side of a container, and a receiving 
unit on the opposite side.

I believe any other systems would be more sophisticated and costly. Keep 
the fires burning. "I'll be back".

Tony


Yeager wrote:

>
> On Saturday, January 4, 2003, at 10:54  PM, Tony LaFemina wrote:
>
> <<portions cut out>>
>
>> Nothing technical was stated to support Jerry's claims, and 
>> electrostatic charges aren't going to cut it.
>>
>
> I think I see the difficulty here. So that we are clear on this, I 
> will start with a paraphrasing of the original question again:
>
> Q: Why does Epson recommend not taking out half used cartridges?
>
> A: There are TWO (not ONE, but TWO) reasons. Earlier I had listed both 
> reasons in one paragraph, but I will break them into smaller chunks.
>
> 1) The first is the way the cartridges work in Epson printers. 
> Cartridges that are inserted must be electrostatically charged so that 
> the ink flows out. This charging must be done each time a cartridge is 
> inserted and doing it repeatedly wastes ink. (This is a standard 
> approach for many ink-jet printers. Other printers use techniques 
> similar to the dye-sublimation type of technology where the ink is 
> forced out of the cartridge by heating. Both methods have benefits.
>
> 2) EARLY versions of OS-X printer drivers were not completed when they 
> were first released. This was true for all of them, including Apple's. 
> The drivers in ink jet printers did not correctly report remaining ink 
> levels if a cartridge was removed and reinserted.
>
> Thus Epson told their customers not to yank the cartridges out until 
> they were empty.
>
> Dig mon?
>
>                 Jerry
>
>
>> If I'm still allowed to be a part of the list, I'll try my best to 
>> keep responses down to one e-mail, but I can't make any guarantees.
>>
>
> No reason you wouldn't be??????
>
>>
>>


-- 
Tony LaFemina
Major in Layout & Design Techniques
Minor in Software Fundamentals
http://hometown.aol.com/visitmacland/index.html
mailto:remacs at optonline.net





| The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will
| be January 28. The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>.


Reply via email to