on 6/16/01 7:19 AM, Christian M. M. Brady at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> OK. I understand what you mean now and more or less agree with you. The same
> is true (perhaps more so) for those who are trying to create drivers for
> peripherals.
Yup - don't even get me started on the peripheral issue. I can fully
understand why there is a reserved delivery of drivers at this point,
limited to only those that Apple heavily evangelized, or essentially wrote
the drivers for them.
The same can be said for companies like Adobe that are reserved about their
actual resources to port to OS X. They prefer to adopt a wait and see
attitude (regardless of their public stances) until Apple has established a
modicum of stability in their various APIs and resources. I can't blame
them.
> Yup, that is what I meant. IE5 for OS 9 is very good, imho, and I believe
> that the IE team is just trying to get the X version up to that level before
> adding anything new to the equation.
And I wholeheartedly agree with that approach, even if it means more
patience for new features - but again, we can always blame Apple for that.
It's a popular past-time :-)
Harry
---
http://www.zinkdifferent.com
To unsubscribe send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To search the archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/macie-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
