At 14:44 -0800 01.30.2001, Nicholas G. Thornton wrote: >I might be acting foolish here but why not do the new version formating as >5.004r2.0, 5.610r1.0 etc? I am not sure what you are asking. I cannot understand what those versions are supposed to represent. -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Morbus Iff
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Chris Nandor
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Nicholas G. Thornton
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl KIMURA Takeshi
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Scott R. Godin
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Chris Nandor
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Morbus Iff
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Chris Nandor
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Terje Bless
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Chris Nandor
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Chris Nandor
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl John Delacour
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Paul Hoffman
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Nicholas G. Thornton
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Chris Nandor
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl robinmcf
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Chris Nandor
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Bart Lateur
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Paul Schinder
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Chris Nandor
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl tedd