At 12:52 PM -0500 1/30/01, Chris Nandor wrote: >Soon we will be doing an analysis of the perl 5.6.1 code (still in >development) to evaluate what would be necessary to move to 5.6.1. I think >most people would prefer releasing 5.6.1 instead of 5.6.0. Yes, absolutely. I have been bitten by some really nasty, really quiet UTF-8 bugs in 5.6.0 which have supposedly been fixed in the 5.6.1 development releases. I don't know what other serious bugs in 5.6.0 are being fixed, but these are both embarrassing and deadly.
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Nicholas G. Thornton
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl KIMURA Takeshi
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Scott R. Godin
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Chris Nandor
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Morbus Iff
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Chris Nandor
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Terje Bless
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Chris Nandor
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Chris Nandor
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl John Delacour
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Paul Hoffman
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Nicholas G. Thornton
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Chris Nandor
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl robinmcf
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Chris Nandor
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Bart Lateur
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Paul Schinder
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl Chris Nandor
- Re: [MacPerl] The State of MacPerl tedd
- [MacPerl] Text File Creator ...was: The ... John Delacour