I think the reason why apple still doesn't allow flash in their devices, among all the speculations of economic cryonism and technical shorthands, is the simple fact that adobe products aren't in coco on a mac. This means old carbon framwork, non compatible with 64 bit processes, and therefore not much of an advantage to would be video editors and other professions of visual communications and audio. Its a standoff between the two companies where one leverages an old problem as the basis for not advancing in the other's way. and this in a strictly diplomatic way. Look for instance the articles about flash being on the promos for the ipad, but not being there when jobs showed it off on stage. It means "look, you can have your platform on our device, but first standardize it to our needs:. And what adobe has to say is "let us put porn on your device", which makes me choose which fence to hurdle (double entendeur).
What i find really interesting though, is that there is no mention of adobe not wanting to switch their carbon code to coco for Apple, whats the reason behind that? Does anyone have anything, a lead somewhere to quench this curious angle i've been carrying in my mind for a while? Have a good saturday Yuma Yuma Decaux Light has no value without darkness Skype: shainobi1 blog: www.theblindsamurai.com twitter: www.twitter.com/triple7 Tel: +85513623378 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
