2 of my macs have 2 GB of ram, and I'm able to run the mac and windows side by 
side without problems. My other mac has 4 GB, certainly if you can afford more 
ram, go for it, it certainly won't hurt any.
On Jun 25, 2011, at 1:02 PM, Neil Barnfather - TalkNav wrote:

> CJ, no one said 2Gb was enough, but on my 3 MAc's with 4Gb each, they never 
> do that busy thing with pages, no-one is saying that to little is enough, but 
> that there is a cross over between not enough and enough, and over board.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Neil Barnfather
> 
> Talks List Administrator
> Twitter @neilbarnfather
> 
> TalkNav is a Nuance, Code Factory and Sendero dealer, for all your
> accessible phone, PDA and GPS related enquiries visit www.talknav.com
> 
> URL: - www.talknav.com
> e-mail: - [email protected]
> Phone: - +44  844 999 4199
> 
> 
> 
> On 25 Jun 2011, at 17:55, CJ Daniel wrote:
> 
> Really,
> 
> Have you tried looking through the hundreds of templates in the opening 
> screen of Pages?  Every time you arrow to another template image there are 
> moments of "Pages Busy," while the VoiceOver tries to process the info.  And, 
> I've got two gigs of ram.  Disagree wholeheartedly.  The more ram, the faster 
> your screen reader will respond.  That's always been my experience, despite 
> what the tech's say.
> 
> CJ
> 
> 
> On Jun 25, 2011, at 12:18 AM, Neil Barnfather - TalkNav wrote:
> 
>> you are being stone walled, I run a major internet hosting operation, it 
>> comes down to what are you doing with your machine? if you are doing basic 
>> word processing, spread sheets, e-mail, internet, the usual things, iTunes 
>> etc etc. then 4Gb is more than enough.
>> 
>> yes, if you are going to start loading multiple voice synth files in, then 
>> you may wish to look at more, but assuming you opt for one, Alex, the basic 
>> Apple voice, which is very good and fine for 99% of users. then 4Gb is more 
>> than enough.
>> 
>> things like Pages, Numbers, Safari and Mail the four key players of apps, oh 
>> and iTunes all use tiny amounts of RAM in real terms, so you are quite 
>> literally paying for the RAM to sit there and do nothing.
>> 
>> this business of the more the merrier, you're the one who is going to be 
>> forking out for all this unutalized RAM, I'm really, very serious about this 
>> over purchase, its just not necessary, you will hand on heart notice 
>> absolutely no difference whatsoever, and anyone thinking you will just 
>> doesn't understand how these things are really put together. its an old 
>> wives tail.
>> 
>> true in the days when we had 8Mb hard drives and when my cache level on my 
>> current machine would make my machine's RAM even 10 years ago, go green with 
>> envy, but this is the 21st century, technology is so very much more than the 
>> RAM in the machine.
>> 
>> save your money, don't forget, you can always easily upgrade RAM later.
>> 
>> put it in one final other way, we have some 76,000 servers running, roughly, 
>> most of these have between 16Gb and 64Gb of RAM, but these are handling 
>> hundreds of clients at any one time, and serving up web pages and e-mail to 
>> millions.
>> 
>> the most strenuous task you are going to do is to ask your machine to tab 
>> between several running applications at the same time, and 4Gb of RAM is 
>> more than enough to achieve this at far higher speeds than your fingers can 
>> press the buttons to achieve the goal.
>> 
>> I've said my bit, more than my bit, this is not so much a twopence worth, as 
>> more my wealth of experience and knowledge in this industry, you are wasting 
>> your money over 4Gb, do not buy less though.
>> 
>> *Note*, this is advice aimed at regular users, if you are about to start 
>> mixing up the decks, or creating your very own commercial home movies, then 
>> lets re-think, but Minister Miller, assuming this is a divinity related 
>> title, if the most you are doing is the odd e-mail, the odd Surinam for 
>> Sunday service, and a like, then seriously, 4Gb... hum, on second thoughts, 
>> is God on WiFi, you might need an extra WiFi base station... :) grin.
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Neil Barnfather
>> 
>> Talks List Administrator
>> Twitter @neilbarnfather
>> 
>> TalkNav is a Nuance, Code Factory and Sendero dealer, for all your
>> accessible phone, PDA and GPS related enquiries visit www.talknav.com
>> 
>> URL: - www.talknav.com
>> e-mail: - [email protected]
>> Phone: - +44  844 999 4199
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 25 Jun 2011, at 05:24, Kliph&Sharrie wrote:
>> 
>> Okay, I am still on a few windows screen readers lists, since I teach a few 
>> basic classes about JFW and know a lot about the windows side of things.  
>> Anyways, someone said on this list that the average blind user needs no more 
>> than 4 gigs of ram, at best anything over 8 would be a waste.  I'm no 
>> exburt, but I have done a little research, and googling and have found that 
>> the more  ram you have, the smoother your system will run, mac or PC.  This 
>> person seem to think even if you had a fast processor, that spending money 
>> on ram was a waste.  Now I will admitt, that apple is a little pricy when it 
>> comes to ram, but there are third party sellers out there with compatible 
>> memory for just about any system.  Thoughts?  Oh, 1 more thing this person 
>> said, that the only way more than 4 gigs would be necessary is if you were 
>> doing some high quality video or audio editing.  What do you all think or 
>> know about these numbers and comments?
>> 
>> Sent from Minister Miller's IPhone
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to