At Wed, 05 Jan 2011 10:47:59 +0000, Marc Herbert wrote: > > Le 05/01/2011 10:25, Moritz Bunkus a écrit : > > I'd say it's standard behaviour for corporate setups to not have > > anything worth backing up solely on a workstation but instead having it > > on a server. > > Thanks Moritz, of course it makes sense to have your whole home > directory hosted on NFS... > > However even in this case I would probably have git avoid NFS, > for instance using a cron job syncing repos located on local hard > drives. The (regular) performance boost should be worth the extra > configuration hassle (only once). > > I think this is how most people tend to backup their git workspaces: > using git itself since it is so efficient.
That only works for the changes that are checked in. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
