On Sat, 27 Apr 2002 15:10:57 -0400 "Eric S. Johansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ESJ> >------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-04-27 09:26 ------- ESJ> >This should work as expected now, it is enough to enter the password once for ESJ> >all folders on the server [using the same login] ESJ> ESJ> woo-hoo! is there any chance of a new Windows 32 executable with this in it? Yes, I'll try to make one soon. I didn't have any fatal problems (yet?) after my changes so I guess it should be relatively safe to let you try it out :-) ESJ> the last time I used 0.64 I managed to trip over the mysterious crash bug ESJ> as well as a few performance challenges. I haven't pursued it any further ESJ> because typing my password in 50 plus times got old real fast. What I don't understand is what is so wrong with storing it. Ok, I understand that some people are really paranoid^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hsecurity conscious and so it should, of course, work if you don't want to store it but deep inside me I think it doesn't change much: if someone can read the values in the registry of your Win32 workstation they can get your passwords anyhow. ESJ> On the crash bug, it's definitely happening less often but it seems to be ESJ> tied in to detecting new mail in the inbox because the only time it seems ESJ> to happen is when mahogany is processing new inbound mail while I'm doing ESJ> something else (reading, replying). Sorry, I completely forgot the details of this one - is there an entry for it in the bug tracker? ESJ> the performance challenges are quite obvious (for me). The first one is on ESJ> startup where I have about a thirty-second delay where mahogany is busy ESJ> doing something but isn't giving me a clue. Reopening the folder(s) you had previously had opened, probably? Try checking the "don't open any folders on startup" in the folders page and see if it makes any difference. ESJ> The second occurs when ESJ> changing how you view e-mail. If I switch from default to HTML or plain ESJ> text viewers, I get another thirty-second plus delay. Wow, HTML could be a bit slow (especially if there are big inline images) but text should be instantaneous. How big is the message you view? Does it improve if you disable different colorization options in the message view page? ESJ> This might be tied into the size of my mailboxes (1000 messages + ESJ> typical) and IMAP. Mine have around 1000 each and I don't have any problems except when the server decides to start dropping connections when it's under load (happens quite a lot in peak hours :-(). In any case, the 2nd problem is surely unrelated to the folder size - only message size could play here. Regards, VZ _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-users
