On Sun, 28 Apr 2002 15:12:58 +0200 (CET) Vadim Zeitlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: VZ> Yes, I'll try to make one soon. I didn't have any fatal problems (yet?) VZ> after my changes so I guess it should be relatively safe to let you try it VZ> out :-)
got it and using it now... woo-hoo! I'm hoping I don't have to go back to Eudora again. I am so easy to please. did you know that the cursor disappears at normal typing speeds? It's really annoying if you are trying to use the arrow keys to navigate text. VZ> VZ> ESJ> the last time I used 0.64 I managed to trip over the mysterious crash VZ> bug VZ> ESJ> as well as a few performance challenges. I haven't pursued it any VZ> further VZ> ESJ> because typing my password in 50 plus times got old real fast. VZ> VZ> What I don't understand is what is so wrong with storing it. Ok, I VZ> understand that some people are really paranoid^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hsecurity VZ> conscious and so it should, of course, work if you don't want to store it VZ> but deep inside me I think it doesn't change much: if someone can read the VZ> values in the registry of your Win32 workstation they can get your VZ> passwords anyhow. no, I'm not a member of the tinfoil hat club. It just never occurred to me to save the password. Honest! VZ> ESJ> On the crash bug, it's definitely happening less often but it seems to VZ> be VZ> ESJ> tied in to detecting new mail in the inbox because the only time it VZ> seems VZ> ESJ> to happen is when mahogany is processing new inbound mail while I'm VZ> doing VZ> ESJ> something else (reading, replying). VZ> VZ> Sorry, I completely forgot the details of this one - is there an entry for VZ> it in the bug tracker? not yet. I wasn't able to get enough details to make a worthwhile bug report. I'm hoping to have a bug report ready for you by the end of this week. VZ> VZ> ESJ> the performance challenges are quite obvious (for me). The first one VZ> is on VZ> ESJ> startup where I have about a thirty-second delay where mahogany is VZ> busy VZ> ESJ> doing something but isn't giving me a clue. VZ> VZ> Reopening the folder(s) you had previously had opened, probably? Try VZ> checking the "don't open any folders on startup" in the folders page and VZ> see if it makes any difference. nope. It doesn't. CPU goes to 100 percent for about 25 seconds and it seems to be tied in with threading. VZ> ESJ> The second occurs when VZ> ESJ> changing how you view e-mail. If I switch from default to HTML or VZ> plain VZ> ESJ> text viewers, I get another thirty-second plus delay. VZ> VZ> Wow, HTML could be a bit slow (especially if there are big inline images) VZ> but text should be instantaneous. How big is the message you view? Does it VZ> improve if you disable different colorization options in the message view VZ> page? I'll have to try disabling the colorization option. I also get the same delay (approximately 30 seconds, 100 percent CPU) when switching to text only viewer. VZ> ESJ> This might be tied into the size of my mailboxes (1000 messages + VZ> ESJ> typical) and IMAP. VZ> VZ> Mine have around 1000 each and I don't have any problems except when the VZ> server decides to start dropping connections when it's under load (happens VZ> quite a lot in peak hours :-(). In any case, the 2nd problem is surely VZ> unrelated to the folder size - only message size could play here. wait a minute. that may be part of the clue. I've been running all IMAP connections through an SHH tunnel on Eudora. And I may have set up mahogany the same way. I don't remember because it's been so long. I'll experiment with this more tomorrow. ---eric _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-users
