On Sat, 3 May 2008 16:21:10 +0200 Vadim Zeitlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 03 May 2008 10:47:56 +0200 Robert Cernansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > RC> 1. Maildir support. > > mailboxes) so you'd need to be available to test it and answer > questions about maildir peculiarities should I have any. Agreed. However I'm no expert to maildir format but I'll answer what I know. ...And I can test it. > RC> 2. Possibility to have aliases for group of e-mail addresses in > > Hmm, we already have "equivalent addresses" option in the > "Addresses" page so it could be used here too by replacing all > addresses equivalent to the given one with the "original" > address. This is a bit ugly though (at the UI level, I mean). Do you > see a better way to implement this? Perhaps a checkbox next to 'Nick Name' and/or 'Full Name' field in ADB named 'Use as alias' would be enough. Another way could be a global option in Preferences saying something like 'Use Nick Name as alias'. In this case, if 'Nick Name' field will be non-empty in ADB, it will be used as alias. Also there is no need to store any additional info per ADB entry. > I'd like to avoid using the ADB for this though. First of all, > because it is so slow that it risks seriously affect the folder view > display. Second because this information is not part of any of the > semi-standard LDAP schemas and I'm looking forward to starting using > LDAP. Addresses-alias map can be stored in some hashed table on disc maybe. Its entries can be added and removed when user modifies a 'Nick Name' field in ADB and fully (re)created when 'Use Nick Name as alias' checkbox in Preferences is switched on. > RC> 3. Improve editor. :-) > > This fails my "useful for myself" criterion as I have "Automatically use > external editor" option on anyhow. But if there any simple changes which > could make your life better, let me know, maybe I still could do it. Me too. :-) However for most users (including me) it is more convenient not to use external editor. Actually, I do not remember why I do not like internal editor because I'm using external one for a long time. I think I did not like wrapping behaviour... > RC> 5. Look for possibilites to sppedup operations on folders with large > RC> number of messages (>5000). > > index for them. So if you already use a local IMAP server anyhow, > you should try passing via it -- does it help? I am using local IMAP. The speed is not that bad, I can live with it. But if there is a room for improvement (some indexes created by Mahogany itself???) then it could be considered as one of the things to implement. > RC> 6. When focus is in mesage view pane, it is not possible to move it > RC> somewhere else with keyboard. > > Hmm, must be wxGTK bug. Under Windows TABbing out works without > problems. Probably wxGTK bug (wxGTK 2.6.4.0 here). > RC> 7. Get it to Gentoo :-) > > Sorry, no help from me here. I've never used Gentoo and seeing the I do not expect from you to do any Gentoo specific work. I've made an ebuild for Mahogany and currently it is waiting in Gentoo bugzilla for wx 3.0. I just wanted to mention some things that are making it difficult to achieve (like dependency on very new wx versions and absence of bugfix releases). Oh, I almost forgot! 8. Encrypt and sign support. "Just" two buttons in toolbar, one for encrypt and one for sign the message. This would be the nr.1 point in my wish-list if I did not forgot. Robert -- Robert Cernansky E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-users
