Didn't Google mention they wanted the age of the keys to count in the spam score?
Old keys tend to have a longer timeframe to get stolen I guess. Maybe a frequent key changes is an indicator of having good ops practices which result in fewer incidents? Funny enough, I have only ever met one customer that wanted to refresh its 1024 bit keys. Yours, David On 10 October 2017 at 05:15, Benjamin BILLON via mailop <mailop@mailop.org> wrote: > Hi John, > > > Do you? > In the way I tried to express it, yes. > Gmail recently said that the selector, or the change of the selector, can > have a role in their anti-spam and reputation system. Just because it's an > element of the email, and that it can indicate something. > It is not used for _reputation_ in its purest, simpliest form (value of d= > is good, value of d=is bad), but it is one of the thousands thinks that > might have a non-null, even if negligible, weight in the whole system. > Soooo, technically,an ISP's scientist or even just tech guy, won't say > that these elements are not part of the reputation system. But the public > should understand "nope, they're not". > I don't know if the other main ISPs include s= or other things in their > decision system, I believe they do. Maybe tomorrow they won't. And the day > after tomorrow, they will again. > > That being said, the main point is that if you have deliverability issues, > probably related to the reputation of a domain name, the incidence of s= or > the public key are not the first things to worry about. Lack of consent, > irrelevant content, bad list hygiene and too much communication pressure > are by far the first causes of problems. > > Cheers, > > > -- > <https://www.splio.com> > Benjamin > > 2017-10-10 10:56 GMT+08:00 John Levine <jo...@taugh.com>: > >> In article <CAJGB_dF0U7dLCtVbU8q0BvhHUpf-72Bq=2trx07_pvl82nn...@mail.gm >> ail.com> you write: >> >ISPs might consider the change of s= or key as an element being part of >> >their reputation systems and metrics. >> >> If they do they are egregiously failing to do what the DKIM spec says >> they should, and I don't know any ISP that does that. >> >> Do you? >> >> It is crystal clear in the spec that selectors are for key management, >> not reputation. If you want mail streams with different reputation, >> use different subdomains in the d= tag. >> >> >> R's, >> John >> > > > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop > > -- -- My opinion is mine.
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
