I can say nothing about Google, but selectors can really have indirect impact on the reputation.
We do not bind reputation directly to objects like domains, selectors, etc and use dynamic tuples instead (that is content of this tuple is flexible to better match specific mailing type), and in many cases DKIM selector is a member of this tuple, because it may be useful to give different reputation for different mail classes, e.g. marketing and transactional from the same domain. Also, it may be used within data feed to classifiers, and classifiers are also used in reputation tuples and there is machine learning inside. So it's really hard to predict how DKIM selector may affect reputation. But surely, it can. 10.10.2017 18:37, Laura Atkins пишет: > >> On Oct 9, 2017, at 8:15 PM, Benjamin BILLON via mailop >> <mailop@mailop.org <mailto:mailop@mailop.org>> wrote: >> >> Hi John, >> >> > Do you? >> In the way I tried to express it, yes. >> Gmail recently said that the selector, or the change of the selector, >> can have a role in their anti-spam and reputation system. Just >> because it's an element of the email, and that it can indicate something. > > I think you misunderstood what was said. The statement was the > selectors do not have an effect on reputation, but that sometimes > people believe they do because they changed the selector at the same > time they changed other things. > > laura > > -- > Having an Email Crisis? 800 823-9674 > > Laura Atkins > Word to the Wise > la...@wordtothewise.com <mailto:la...@wordtothewise.com> > (650) 437-0741 > > Email Delivery Blog: http://wordtothewise.com/blog > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop -- Vladimir Dubrovin @Mail.Ru
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
